Thursday, January 25, 2007

I recently read Michael Crichton’s ‘State of Fear’. It opened my eyes.
The book is about ‘environmentalists-terrorists’ and a group of people who try to stop them. It came as a shock to me that even environmentalists could be extremists.
Circhton has used ample references to verify his facts that are a part of the story. Some of which are-
1) The earth’s temperature is indeed rising, the phenomenon we call as global-warming, but it has been happening since several hundred years after the mini Ice-age.
2) Nobody knows how much of human activity is responsible for the rise in earth’s temperature or for that matter, even the rise in the levels of carbon-di-oxide.
3) It has been ‘guessed’ that at the current rate, the phenomenon of ‘global-warming’ for which millions of dollars are being spent, will cause about 0.8 degree Celsius of rise in the earth’s temperature in a century!
4) The Kyoto treaty claims to bring down this rise by about 0.3 degree Celsius.
5) Nobody has an accurate data of temperature of the past century in the world. In fact, the warming is not even uniformly ‘global’ according to the data. The rates differ, in some parts the temperature has either remained the same or there has been a documented decline!
6) No rise in sea-level anywhere in the world attributed to global warming has been recorded.
7) Similarly, there is no evidence of global warming causing melting of glaciers or ice-caps anywhere around the world.
8) Our climate is too dynamic for us to exert any effect on it, positive or negative. Storms, earth-quakes, floods, draught, tsunamis, are not under our control.
9) We have a very little understanding of our environment. We really don’t know how to ‘manage’ wilderness.
10) All this is the result of lack of experts/scientists in environmental organizations which are run by litigators and donators who have no absolutely relation with science.
I signed the online petition forwarded to me by WWF favoring the Kyoto treaty few years ago. I thought ‘global warming’ would one day eventually submerge all the coastal cities. I thought somehow we were responsible for the natural calamities I’ve seen in my lifetime. I never knew how, but I do remember my science books in school claiming so and many NGOs and celebrity volunteers shouting the same as loud as they could into my ears through the media! Do they even know?
My beliefs are shaken. I’d take all news reports from now on with a pinch of salt. Especially the studies, which are more often than not sponsored and hence have an agenda. Blinded scientific studies are actually hard to find. Their results are already in the researchers’ expectations.
I’ve also decided to ‘learn’ about our environment rather than just assume that humans are responsible for all the disasters. In fact, that is the only way we can hope to reduce the damage we might be doing. Step one is to know the damage and its cause. Interestingly, ‘State of Fear’ also mentions that some global warming might even be advantageous! It may increase our crop production considerably.
Crichton has written this book to bring to our notice the farce of ignorant environmental organizations/individuals. The story is a by-product. He’s kept the language obviously simple. The concept of a state of fear is also very interesting but I’d like you to read the book to understand it. It tells you how the world thinks. Everyone should read it.

5 Comments:

At Sunday, January 28, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Spriha, came across your blog.Would like to add certain points:
1. Although global warming started after the Ice age, earth surface has encountered unprecedented warming over the last five decades.Its not difficult to identify "human fingerprints" associated with the change.
2.A model(General circulation model) created by simulation softwares clearly indicate that "both" natural and human induced drivers better match the observed change in climatic conditions.As per the statistics there has been substancial increase in the CO2 emission in the BRIC block with India leading with 45%.
3.0.8 deg C is a too conservative estimate. Global temperature raised by more than 1.3 deg F in the last three decades (source IPCC).It would be anywhere between 1.4 to 5.8 deg C in the coming century.
4. The credibility of Kyoto protocol is undermined considering the fact that it excludes US.
5.Crichton's analysis is incomplete and based on few papers.
6.&7.There are two reasons to this
(i)Oceans heat up over an extended period of time.
(ii)Part of increase in temperature is negated "temporarily" by increase in suphate aerosol which block sun rays. The decrease in some places have been due to local variations owing to this.
8.I agree that climate is dynamic.However, GSM prediction based on only natural activities gives inaccurate projection of the temperature over the last century.

Its too late to 'learn' about the environment. Its time to take "action".More than emphasising on how the world thinks, I find the book tells us how does Chricton 'thinks'.

Respectfully

Thinker. Bombay India

 
At Sunday, January 28, 2007, Blogger spriha said...

Well anonymous thinker, I am not propagating Crichton's thoughts. And no where did I say that we aren't damaging the ecosystem. Pollution is a real problem and I can see why.
I can't say the same thing about global warming.
And if u've read the book then u'll not mention the rise in the last three decades. Also the simulation predictions.
Its important to take action but its never late to learn about it. Otherwise ur actions will do more harm than good. Again u should read the book to understand that.
Thanks for ur comment.

 
At Sunday, January 28, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I sincerely appreciate your effort of learning about the environment.Also,I agree that actions taken on false assumptions and informations will eventually result in more harm than good.( I 've had experiences)The statement which I made in my previous post should be understood in a broader context.( and not at the personal level)
I have read your previous posts.I think that you have an exceptional writing skill. It manifests deep thought and personal reflection.Looking forward to some really nice piece of writing in future from your side.

Thinker.Bombay India

 
At Monday, January 29, 2007, Blogger Dex said...

Really, its been quite some time since a post has made me think so much.
Instinctively I think that maybe Crichton is wrong, but I would rather not comment on it until I have done some research on my own.
But one thing's for sure, you write quite well - and its gonna make me buy 'State of Fear' tomorrow...

 
At Monday, March 26, 2007, Blogger Sumedh said...

Global warming might be debatable but I don't think there exists a debate about whether human beings have been responsible for a lot of bad things on planet earth. The truth is too obvious to be overlooked.

Thousands of animal species have been directly or indirectly driven to extinction thanks to us. Millions of our own beings suffer because of man-made pollution, smoke, effluent discharge etc.

The Kyoto treaty speaks mainly about fossil fuel combustion, smoke and carbon-dioxide. You may argue the impact of this on global warming, but how can you undermine the fact that smoke due to fossil fuel combustion is responsible for so much cancer, asthma and COPD - just to name a few?

Global warming is debatable, but there's no doubt that human beings have done the planet a huge disservice by their "development".

 

Post a Comment

<< Home